336
edits
Changes
→Status of biology
:::Atang, in my opinion, the article doesn't really say anything about "physical science." If you want, we could work together to re-write it. [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 11:22, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
:::Atang, in my opinion, the article doesn't really say anything about "physical science." If you want, we could work together to re-write it. [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 11:22, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
:::Well, right now I don't like how it's simply broken down into operational science and origins science. The only thing I can think of is maybe giving a brief introduction into each of the stated sciences (astronomy, physics, biology), and including the links to the appropriate places. Other than that I couldn't think of too much to add - it's such a broad field I don't know how much detail we should add. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 11:28, 26 July 2007 (EDT)