Changes

Line 130: Line 130:  
::::The reason it deserves a re-write is that it has a ton of extraneous information (I'm just looking at the first few paragraphs; it'd be dangerous to change anything below that). If you follow a logical organization, then "physical sciences" are an implementation or subset of "science" (to use computer science terms). It should inherit any characteristic of science, so it is redundant to point out that physical sciences use the "scientific method." Really, the page should exist as nothing more than a note that physical sciences are those subsets of science that deal with non-living systems; any other information without extrapolating on that idea specifically is irrelevant. I guess i'll just add it to my list of stuff to fix, even though I only ever get 30 non-consecutive minutes or so per day to fix them. [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 11:37, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
 
::::The reason it deserves a re-write is that it has a ton of extraneous information (I'm just looking at the first few paragraphs; it'd be dangerous to change anything below that). If you follow a logical organization, then "physical sciences" are an implementation or subset of "science" (to use computer science terms). It should inherit any characteristic of science, so it is redundant to point out that physical sciences use the "scientific method." Really, the page should exist as nothing more than a note that physical sciences are those subsets of science that deal with non-living systems; any other information without extrapolating on that idea specifically is irrelevant. I guess i'll just add it to my list of stuff to fix, even though I only ever get 30 non-consecutive minutes or so per day to fix them. [[User:Stryker|Stryker]] 11:37, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
   −
:::::I'll take a stab at it if I have time; it's just that I've never edited anything this major before (all my contributions are minor edits). The section on scientific method could go then. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 12:00, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
+
:::::I'll take a stab at it if I have time; it's just that I've never edited anything this major before (and by major I mean this is a huge umbrella with potential for high traffic. I've only done dead-end articles - or "leaf" articles, in computer terminology =P). The section on scientific method could go then. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 12:00, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
336

edits