60
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 164:
Line 164: − + Line 173:
Line 173: + +
I am afraid
:How about a general article on [[friendly fire]] first? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:39, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
:How about a general article on [[friendly fire]] first? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:39, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
Well, I see you removed the information I'd added. I would point out two things:-
Well, I see you removed the information I'd added. I would point out three things:-
a) I'm not a "Bush-hater".
a) I'm not a "Bush-hater".
:Your point is well taken. We could use some more information on Tilman and Goodman. One of the virtues of a democracy with a [[free press]] is that errors and misconduct can be brought to light by ordinary citizens. When this is not done for [[partisan advantage]], it's usually a good thing. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:59, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
:Your point is well taken. We could use some more information on Tilman and Goodman. One of the virtues of a democracy with a [[free press]] is that errors and misconduct can be brought to light by ordinary citizens. When this is not done for [[partisan advantage]], it's usually a good thing. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:59, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
Exactly, Ed. I wouold do it, except I fear a ban from a certain someone if I put Tillman back in. Perhaps someone else would tackle it? It seems to me that an announcement that a three-star general is to be censured over the matter makes this a notable enough example of deceit in high places, and deserving of appearing in the article, and it will also make the article less biased. Deceit is practiced by all who are prepared to lie, regardless of the color of their stripes. [[User:NotForgotten|NotForgotten]] 20:03, 31 July 2007 (EDT)