997
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 328:
Line 328: +
→SSM as an attack on the institution of marriage
:::Ed, maybe you could explain your reasoning. I can't for the life of me understand how SSM could have a negative effect on anyone else's marriage. Are you worried that those sneaky gays will trick people into marrying them who'd otherwise be marrying opposite-sex partners? I realize that's probably not actually the objection, but what is it? [[User:Murray|Murray]] 19:38, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
:::Ed, maybe you could explain your reasoning. I can't for the life of me understand how SSM could have a negative effect on anyone else's marriage. Are you worried that those sneaky gays will trick people into marrying them who'd otherwise be marrying opposite-sex partners? I realize that's probably not actually the objection, but what is it? [[User:Murray|Murray]] 19:38, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
:::I agree with Murray...I know many gays who want nothing more than to have their unions legally recognized as marriages...some of these people have been together for decades, but still have to file taxes seperately. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 16:11, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
==Snipping Wikipedia-sourced long list==
==Snipping Wikipedia-sourced long list==