Changes

Line 153: Line 153:     
:: It's not intended as humour - I don't know what the "conservative" stance on CIA World Factbook is. I know people who trust it, and others who don't. Many instances I look at something as fact and it's considered liberal bias here. I'm just trying to improve an article. There's no need to get aggressive. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 13:36, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
 
:: It's not intended as humour - I don't know what the "conservative" stance on CIA World Factbook is. I know people who trust it, and others who don't. Many instances I look at something as fact and it's considered liberal bias here. I'm just trying to improve an article. There's no need to get aggressive. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 13:36, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
*That wasn't agressive, lol.  You must be very sheltered!  I think any government source in the U.S. is okay, but I don't take most any source, on its own, to be the end all and be all.  I have found entries in the Fact Book that are severely dated. --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 21:22, 7 August 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits