nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
no edit summary
Sorry, paraphrasing. The article state "it effectively elevates the legal standing of unmarried homosexuals above those of unmarried heterosexual couples". Since partners in a civil union don't have nearly the rights of a legally married heterosexual couple, that's why I included the {{fact}} citation. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 18:12, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
Sorry, paraphrasing. The article state "it effectively elevates the legal standing of unmarried homosexuals above those of unmarried heterosexual couples". Since partners in a civil union don't have nearly the rights of a legally married heterosexual couple, that's why I included the {{fact}} citation. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 18:12, 8 August 2007 (EDT)
:Maestro I don't like what I'm hearing. Basically you put a fact citation to a section that that didn't deserve it because you didn't like that the article left out other information that you felt should be considered. This entire conversation that we have had was completely unnecessary. Please apply fact citations sparingly to areas where you feel an error exists in the sentence where you are applying the citation. Other uses are counter-productive. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 02:15, 9 August 2007 (EDT)