Changes

766 bytes added ,  03:20, August 12, 2007
no edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:     
: You're "sure a judge would allow it"???  You must be joking.  A judge would not even allow a comprehensive independent evaluation while Terri was alive, and no independent review was allowed during or after the autopsy.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:59, 11 August 2007 (EDT)
 
: You're "sure a judge would allow it"???  You must be joking.  A judge would not even allow a comprehensive independent evaluation while Terri was alive, and no independent review was allowed during or after the autopsy.  Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:59, 11 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
I'm not joking, and a judge did allow an independent examination of Terri.  Her parents were even allowed to pick their own physicians and they were allowed access to Terri and were able to review her medical history.  All this was covered in my reference. http://abstractappeal.com/schiavo/WolfsonReport.pdf  If you have a problem with my reference please let me know.
 +
 +
It looks like you are insisting that all the evidence of Terri's autiopsy was destroyed.  Where is your reference?  You are editing this article and making assertions without references.  Why?  Aren't you violating commandment #2 by doing that?  By the way, the alleged liberal bias you said was 'creeping in' has been there since March I believe.  Thanks  --Lakota 23:20, 11 August 2007 (EDT)
16

edits