2,002
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 25:
Line 25: + + +
Remark regarding the last revert
Essentially, Intelligent Design, as is, can not be a scientific theory unless you can prove the existence of God with the scientific method. You can believe it, you could be right, but it is not science. This is the reason why the petition to have it taught in the science classroom was denied.
Essentially, Intelligent Design, as is, can not be a scientific theory unless you can prove the existence of God with the scientific method. You can believe it, you could be right, but it is not science. This is the reason why the petition to have it taught in the science classroom was denied.
Proponents of intelligent design always, such as Behe, stress that the guiding intelligence is probably God, but that it doesn't have to be. This is necessary to ensure that intelligent can be viewed as science raher than religious dogma. [[User:Order|Order]] 10:20 (AEST)