Changes

Talk:Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia (view source)

Revision as of 22:12, August 13, 2007

617 bytes added , 22:12, August 13, 2007

Line 91: Line 91:

:::You know, reading number 13, if I recall, Jimbo never did take action, and stood behind Essjay. It was Essjay himself who finally resigned because of the public pressure. [[User:RobS|Rob Smith]] 18:10, 13 August 2007 (EDT)

+

::: Masterbratac, in response to your question, that was the apparent liberal's only edit that was not reverted, perhaps because the Sysop who did the blocking felt it was only an essay.

+

::: But why do you blame Conservapedia for this? You were fooled by an apparent [[liberal]], not by a [[conservative]]. Conservatives generally don't get a thrill out of deceiving others. Life is much easier (and more just) when one is not surrounded by [[deceit]]. It really is.

+

::: FYI, you can view the history of any page and then see who inserted each change.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:12, 13 August 2007 (EDT)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,222

edits