Changes

An Executive Conference was formed consisting of the Attorney General, Department of Justice Prosecutors, and the FBI to discuss the Silvermaster subjects and how to proceed with prosecution.  The United Press began running stories on the case with information coming directly out of the Conference meeting.  In a hand written note in the margin of a memo from January 23, 1947, Hoover writes, "in view of all the 'gabbing" done by the Dept to the Press there is little which can be expected from <u>any</u> action now." <ref>FBI Silvermaster file, Tamm to the Director, January 23, 1947, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster093.pdf Vol. 93, pgs. 20 -22] pdf.</ref>

An Executive Conference was formed consisting of the Attorney General, Department of Justice Prosecutors, and the FBI to discuss the Silvermaster subjects and how to proceed with prosecution.  The United Press began running stories on the case with information coming directly out of the Conference meeting.  In a hand written note in the margin of a memo from January 23, 1947, Hoover writes, "in view of all the 'gabbing" done by the Dept to the Press there is little which can be expected from <u>any</u> action now." <ref>FBI Silvermaster file, Tamm to the Director, January 23, 1947, [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster093.pdf Vol. 93, pgs. 20 -22] pdf.</ref>

===Morgan Memorandum===

===Morgan memorandum===

Edward Morgan of the FBI was asked to make an objective analysis of where the case stood from a legal and investigative standpoint.  This document, Morgan's memorandum, sheds much light on what was to follow in the ensuing years. <ref>FBI Silvermaster file, [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Memo_Morgan_to_Clegg%2C_Janaury_14%2C_1947 Morgan to Clegg, January 14, 1947].</ref>  Morgan writes, "there exists a fraternal and intimate social bond" among the group and some of the finest legal talent in the country could be expected to be retained for their defense. Without [[Venona]] evidence, Morgan declares "the case is no more than the word of Gregory against that of the several conspirators. The likely result would be an acquittal under very embarrassing circumstances."  Morgan observes, "Coming in after the event as the Bureau did, we are now on the outside looking in, with the rather embarrassing responsibility of having a most serious case of Soviet espionage laid in our laps without a decent opportunity to make it stick. This very circumstance, however, necessitates pursuing more direct methods" and states, "this case is one of Soviet espionage or it is nothing."  Morgan proposes developing one of the "lesser lights" as an informant to corroborate Bentley, but acknowledges the unlikelihood of it occurring.  "I doubt if any more can be accomplished of probative value through further investigation apart from the interviews."  Morgan refers to the political problem Bentley laid in their lap 10 years after the fact, "I personally am of the opinion that the Bureau would be subjected to possible criticism as being derelict in its responsibility in this instance if the various subjects were not thoroughly and exhaustively interviewed. The odds are not too good that such interviews would terminate successfully; however, it is quite possible that some of the lesser lights among the subjects would crack during the course of a careful and pointed interview."

Edward Morgan of the FBI was asked to make an objective analysis of where the case stood from a legal and investigative standpoint.  This document, Morgan's memorandum, sheds much light on what was to follow in the ensuing years. <ref>FBI Silvermaster file, [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/FBI_Memo_Morgan_to_Clegg%2C_Janaury_14%2C_1947 Morgan to Clegg, January 14, 1947].</ref>  Morgan writes, "there exists a fraternal and intimate social bond" among the group and some of the finest legal talent in the country could be expected to be retained for their defense. Without [[Venona]] evidence, Morgan declares "the case is no more than the word of Gregory against that of the several conspirators. The likely result would be an acquittal under very embarrassing circumstances."  Morgan observes, "Coming in after the event as the Bureau did, we are now on the outside looking in, with the rather embarrassing responsibility of having a most serious case of Soviet espionage laid in our laps without a decent opportunity to make it stick. This very circumstance, however, necessitates pursuing more direct methods" and states, "this case is one of Soviet espionage or it is nothing."  Morgan proposes developing one of the "lesser lights" as an informant to corroborate Bentley, but acknowledges the unlikelihood of it occurring.  "I doubt if any more can be accomplished of probative value through further investigation apart from the interviews."  Morgan refers to the political problem Bentley laid in their lap 10 years after the fact, "I personally am of the opinion that the Bureau would be subjected to possible criticism as being derelict in its responsibility in this instance if the various subjects were not thoroughly and exhaustively interviewed. The odds are not too good that such interviews would terminate successfully; however, it is quite possible that some of the lesser lights among the subjects would crack during the course of a careful and pointed interview."