2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Same-sex marriage (view source)
Revision as of 19:04, September 3, 2007
, 19:04, September 3, 2007no edit summary
{{Talk:Same-sex marriage/pov }}
{{Talk:Same-sex marriage/pov }}
=="The rationale goes like this" is completly wrong==
"The rationale goes like this:
Marriage is good.
No one can criticize what is good.
A same-sex union, defined as marriage, is good.
Therefore, no one can criticize same-sex unions."
That is ''not'' the Liberal rationale for legalizing gay marriage, if that is going to remain there there should be at least a few sources as to which Leberal said that.
The ''actual'' liberal rational:
* Marriage, like '''all''' institutions of the law, should not be defined by ''one'' or ''any'' specefic religion, or religion all together.
* The fact that the legallity of Gay marriage is the debate proves its a matter of law, automatically disqualifing any given religions say on it. ''See also: [[seperation of church and state]]''
* Atheists can and do get married, further proof it isn't a religious establishment.
* A homosexuals person's life has nothing to do with ''yours'', and because homosexuallity does not violate any human rights, ''you'' should not have the right to tell them they cannot get married.
I realize this is conservapedia and you guys would rather have untruthful things that make you sound right, but reality is better than ''sounding'' right if you ask me.
==Bias==
==Bias==