181
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 151:
Line 151: + +
Talk:Essay:Liberal Intellectualism (view source)
Revision as of 21:08, September 6, 2007
, 21:08, September 6, 2007→Response
:*It was obvious to me that Andy was talking about the physiological differences, not social. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷ�?ô�?-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣ�?ёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 16:59, 6 September 2007 (EDT)
:*It was obvious to me that Andy was talking about the physiological differences, not social. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷ�?ô�?-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣ�?ёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 16:59, 6 September 2007 (EDT)
:: If that is the case, then that needs to be said. All of the other points in this list are about social issues, government policies and the like. To say that the genders are not equal in this context seems to be to be very much about the social differences of the genders. This is especially true when reading up on some of the conservative speakers and their positions on gender equality. Phyllis Schlafly statements about the equal rights ammendment[http://volokh.com/2003_11_16_volokh_archive.html#106917664607446885], and Ann Coulter has written on reconsidering the 19th ammendment[http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a38a7cb4c3104.htm]. What is meant by "Genders are not equal - obviously true" needs to be spelled out so there cannot be any misinterpretation of the message that is intended. --[[User:Rutm|Rutm]] 17:08, 6 September 2007 (EDT)
* African Americans are more deserving of civil rights than homosexuals
* African Americans are more deserving of civil rights than homosexuals