Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Response: taking out the garbage
Line 207: Line 207:     
: The 90/10 [[rule]] against endless talk is enforced.  Please abide by it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:42, 6 September 2007 (EDT)
 
: The 90/10 [[rule]] against endless talk is enforced.  Please abide by it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:42, 6 September 2007 (EDT)
  −
This article is a midget trying to pull down giants. [[User:Mandrew|Mandrew]] 18:38, 6 September 2007 (EDT)
  −
  −
"Andy is a privileged, ignorant man-child" [[User:Mandrew|Mandrew]] 18:41, 6 September 2007 (EDT)
  −
  −
'Is there really anything he touches on that site that doesn't amount to "Liberals are big, stupid poopy-heads"? ' Nope. [[User:Mandrew|Mandrew]] 18:42, 6 September 2007 (EDT)
      
===real intellectuals===
 
===real intellectuals===
 
i think it would be helpful for this discussion if we had another essay about real intellecuals. liberal, conservative, or moderate. there are a few examples given on this page, but i think more might answer questions about who is included and who isn't. the founding fathers are a good example. i would be against people being included just for being well known conservatives. i admire much about george w bush, for example, but i wouldn't call him an "intellectual". he didn't run as one, and we didn't elect him for that. [[User:AuH2O|AuH2O]]
 
i think it would be helpful for this discussion if we had another essay about real intellecuals. liberal, conservative, or moderate. there are a few examples given on this page, but i think more might answer questions about who is included and who isn't. the founding fathers are a good example. i would be against people being included just for being well known conservatives. i admire much about george w bush, for example, but i wouldn't call him an "intellectual". he didn't run as one, and we didn't elect him for that. [[User:AuH2O|AuH2O]]
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu