nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 214:
Line 214: − − == Recruiting == − - − - For those of you still reading, Bayes, OldFaithful/NewFaithful, etc., you all did a great job fighting Aschlafly. Would you please join R<!----->ation<!--------->alW<!---------->iki? We'd love to have you there. We're devoted to laughing at, mocking, and actively fighting Conservapedia. You'd like it there; we're very impressed. Bayes, we even saved your essay. − − Andy, this essay is a joke, right? − − TK, you're a coward.-[[User:AveMaria|AveMaria]] 21:48, 6 September 2007 (EDT) − This… "essay", if it even deserves to be called that, is abjectly ludicrous. The only purpose of this site seems to be to expose how liberals have never improved the world at all. I propose that Conservapedia be renames Conservasite, as -pedia generally implies useful content. --[[User:CabalVive|CabalVive]] 22:03, 6 September 2007 (EDT)
Talk:Essay:Liberal Intellectualism (view source)
Revision as of 02:03, September 7, 2007
, 02:03, September 7, 2007Reverted edits by CabalVive (Talk); changed back to last version by Tash
===real intellectuals===
===real intellectuals===
i think it would be helpful for this discussion if we had another essay about real intellecuals. liberal, conservative, or moderate. there are a few examples given on this page, but i think more might answer questions about who is included and who isn't. the founding fathers are a good example. i would be against people being included just for being well known conservatives. i admire much about george w bush, for example, but i wouldn't call him an "intellectual". he didn't run as one, and we didn't elect him for that. [[User:AuH2O|AuH2O]]
i think it would be helpful for this discussion if we had another essay about real intellecuals. liberal, conservative, or moderate. there are a few examples given on this page, but i think more might answer questions about who is included and who isn't. the founding fathers are a good example. i would be against people being included just for being well known conservatives. i admire much about george w bush, for example, but i wouldn't call him an "intellectual". he didn't run as one, and we didn't elect him for that. [[User:AuH2O|AuH2O]]