Changes

Line 289: Line 289:  
I think the Scientific Method can be successfully exploited in the [[evolution]] article.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 04:23, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 
I think the Scientific Method can be successfully exploited in the [[evolution]] article.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 04:23, 11 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:Counter - Direct observation is not required for something to be scientifically valid. --[[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 00:27, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:Counter - Direct observation is not required for something to be scientifically valid. --[[User:ColinR|ColinR]] 00:27, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::So, what you just said was that a scientist need not observe the fish turning into the frog, that we are to take his word for it that it happened.  Is that your statement?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 13:17, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336

edits