Changes

615 bytes added ,  19:32, September 10, 2007
Line 50: Line 50:     
::Personally I'm not a big fan of the broad brush stroke used to paint the religion picture.  By the definitions given, being pro-abortion could be considered to be a religion.  I feel, personally, we should have stuck to the primary definition.  Religion should have something to do with belief in God (gods) or the supernatural. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 15:18, 10 September 2007 (EDT)
 
::Personally I'm not a big fan of the broad brush stroke used to paint the religion picture.  By the definitions given, being pro-abortion could be considered to be a religion.  I feel, personally, we should have stuck to the primary definition.  Religion should have something to do with belief in God (gods) or the supernatural. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 15:18, 10 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:: The question of disbelief in the supernatural for an atheist does not enter his or her mind when making a choice.  There is no WWJD thought that happens to an atheist, and thus that disbelief does not strongly influence his or her thoughts - there is no "because I am an atheist, the right thing to do is this."  If the person is a secular humanist, then there is something - but not all atheists are secular humanists.  Thus, with this definition, atheism and agnosticism are not religions while Buddhism (being debated elsewhere as a philosophy or not) is. --[[User:Rutm|Rutm]] 15:32, 10 September 2007 (EDT)
181

edits