123
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 230:
Line 230: + + + +
The VVYE point of view has been left out
In [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Astronomy&diff=next&oldid=210224 this] edit, the full text of the material was cited - it was from the article http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/295/5555/605 that was quoted above. It was not commentary - it was the full context of the quote. Feel free to purchase a copy of the article and verify it for yourself. Until then, removing it as uncited junk is misleading. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 00:40, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
In [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Astronomy&diff=next&oldid=210224 this] edit, the full text of the material was cited - it was from the article http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/295/5555/605 that was quoted above. It was not commentary - it was the full context of the quote. Feel free to purchase a copy of the article and verify it for yourself. Until then, removing it as uncited junk is misleading. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 00:40, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
== The VVYE point of view has been left out ==
I think that this article isn't nearly conservative enough. All this rubbish about science and billions of years or 6000 years. What a bunch of rubbish!! Anyone with have a brain should be certain that the whole universe was created a few hours ago!! It all just came into being just as it is now. Prove it otherwise!! You can't can you. How do you know it wasn't? Stupid scientist and stupid Bible studiers! You should have more information here on the Very Very Young Earth POV. The rest is rubbish that you all can't prove!! [[User:Wismike|Wismike]] 17:53, 13 September 2007 (EDT)Wismike