Changes

Line 248: Line 248:  
* Everyone is welcome to add to WP, if you don't feel that the entry on deceit contains enough examples then try adding some, just remember quality over quantity and that an encyclopedia article does not need every single case of deceit to explain it (it may contain a few examples to clarify the definition, and if necessary a historic recount of deception. The proper entry would be "List of Acts of Deceit")
 
* Everyone is welcome to add to WP, if you don't feel that the entry on deceit contains enough examples then try adding some, just remember quality over quantity and that an encyclopedia article does not need every single case of deceit to explain it (it may contain a few examples to clarify the definition, and if necessary a historic recount of deception. The proper entry would be "List of Acts of Deceit")
 
[[User:EQ|EQ]] 00:28, 15 September 2007 (EDT)
 
[[User:EQ|EQ]] 00:28, 15 September 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Wikipedia encourages silly entries on obscure and [[liberal]] albums to build traffic.  Yes, this does reflect its bias.  Wikipedia encourages edits by anonymous IP addresses that lead to pervasive [[liberal]] vandalism.  Yes, this does reflect bias.  Wikipedia changed its redirect for [[deceit]] only after we complained here.  Case closed.
 +
 +
: The excuses made for Wikipedia are getting tiresome, but have led to an addition of another point in [[liberal style]]:  [[liberals]] don't believe in accountability.  In Christ,--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:37, 15 September 2007 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,367

edits