nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
→Conservative viewpoint
As a person with many conservative tendencies and views, I am dismayed at the quality of this article. That the first (and only) major section deals with the YEC view is not representative of most conservatives' views. If Conservapedia is for the consumption of YEC conservatives only then I suppose that's fair. But that's very restricting as it's only a small minority of conservatives. This article should present the facts that we know for sure about galaxies, then and only then talk about the theological positions of a minority of conservatives. i.e. YEC. You are simply ensuring that most conservatives won't take this site seriously. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 13:05, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
As a person with many conservative tendencies and views, I am dismayed at the quality of this article. That the first (and only) major section deals with the YEC view is not representative of most conservatives' views. If Conservapedia is for the consumption of YEC conservatives only then I suppose that's fair. But that's very restricting as it's only a small minority of conservatives. This article should present the facts that we know for sure about galaxies, then and only then talk about the theological positions of a minority of conservatives. i.e. YEC. You are simply ensuring that most conservatives won't take this site seriously. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 13:05, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
*You are an editor, no? Do you have cited facts and links to add to any content you add? Please feel free to add content, but please do other editors, who might believe differently than you or I, the courtesy of not removing the YEC content without discussion. Fair enough? --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 07:59, 21 September 2007 (EDT)