Open main menu
Home
Random
Log in
Settings
About Conservapedia
Disclaimers
Conservapedia
Search
Changes
← Older edit
Newer edit →
Talk:Arguments for the existence of God
(view source)
Revision as of 12:30, September 25, 2007
39 bytes added
,
12:30, September 25, 2007
no edit summary
Line 2:
Line 2:
:Thank you, but I'm not sure that would qualify as an argument ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 22:22, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
:Thank you, but I'm not sure that would qualify as an argument ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 22:22, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
−
+
AWDFGUGSDEH56RFTJUFW
+
J#F6
I don't think Douglas Adams style theology will fly very far on this site. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:31, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
I don't think Douglas Adams style theology will fly very far on this site. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:31, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
:I don't expect it to. I was trying to make a funny. Apparently, I failed. :(--[[User:Autofire|Autofire]] 22:32, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
:I don't expect it to. I was trying to make a funny. Apparently, I failed. :(--[[User:Autofire|Autofire]] 22:32, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
−
42. [[User:
DanH
|DanH]] 22:33, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
+
42. [[User:
DafhgsdfsdffqwfgnH
|DanH]] 22:33, 7 June 2007 (EDT)
:Ah, yes. Except the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything is actually 54...
:Ah, yes. Except the answer to the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything is actually 54...
JanisJoplin
10
edits