Siteadmin, Check users, Administrators
12,071
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 125:
Line 125: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 16:35, September 25, 2007
, 16:35, September 25, 2007→Yet more pro-evolution bias on Wikipedia.
:: Because they've deluded themselves into thinking that [[creationism|this]] is science. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup>
:: Because they've deluded themselves into thinking that [[creationism|this]] is science. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup>
:::Then suppose you tell us: what exactly ''is'' science? And where is it written that science ''ipso facto'' excludes non-material explanations for events, and rejects them ''a priori'' as untenable?--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 12:35, 25 September 2007 (EDT)