144
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 139:
Line 139: + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 17:14, September 25, 2007
, 17:14, September 25, 2007→Yet more pro-evolution bias on Wikipedia.
#Wikipedia or any other body is censoring certain findings, or
#Wikipedia or any other body is censoring certain findings, or
#whether such censorship is appropriate.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 13:03, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
#whether such censorship is appropriate.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 13:03, 25 September 2007 (EDT)
Oh, Doctor, you should have told me I was talking to the King of England! Get over yourself.
I do not have specific credentials, neither am I particularly aware of the intricacies of the scientific world (I am a Historian, not a scientist) but what I do know beyond any shred of a doubt is creationism is not science, and you cannot possibly tell me that it is. The best any creationist can ever come up with is that 'evolution has flaws'. Well so does democracy, so does every single discovery by the human race. You would do well to find me a flawless 'theory'. [[User:Graham|Graham]] 13:14, 25 September 2007 (EDT)