Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 232: Line 232:  
Apparently an example of bias on Wiki is that it has no entry for "liberal" (it redirects to "liberalism"). One would note that the non-existent article on "conservative" redirects to "conservatism". It's common practice on Wikipedia to point directly to a philosophy rather than to its practitioners to avoid clutter. The liberal page, if it existed, would merely read as "one who practices the philosophy of liberalism. (See Liberalism)".  
 
Apparently an example of bias on Wiki is that it has no entry for "liberal" (it redirects to "liberalism"). One would note that the non-existent article on "conservative" redirects to "conservatism". It's common practice on Wikipedia to point directly to a philosophy rather than to its practitioners to avoid clutter. The liberal page, if it existed, would merely read as "one who practices the philosophy of liberalism. (See Liberalism)".  
   −
Why is this bias?
+
Why is this bias?[[User:Archibald|Archibald]] 19:27, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
    
== "Wikipedia allows the use of B.C.E. instead of B.C. and C.E. instead of A.D." ==
 
== "Wikipedia allows the use of B.C.E. instead of B.C. and C.E. instead of A.D." ==
20

edits

Navigation menu