277
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 20:
Line 20: + + +
Debate:Is "Coercive Interrogation" consistent with Christian Values? (view source)
Revision as of 15:09, October 9, 2007
, 15:09, October 9, 2007no edit summary
:Get people scared enough, and they can rationalize [[Holocaust|ANYTHING]], as long as it's being done to someone outside their [[Monkeysphere]]. --[[User:Gulik2|Gulik2]] 02:54, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
:Get people scared enough, and they can rationalize [[Holocaust|ANYTHING]], as long as it's being done to someone outside their [[Monkeysphere]]. --[[User:Gulik2|Gulik2]] 02:54, 25 April 2007 (EDT)
==Irrelevant==
This is not even relevant for argument. Christian values are inapplicable with coercive interrogation. As unrelated to Christian values as using a bayonet on someone or flying a civilian airliner into a building full of civilians. What is being attempted here is just another attempt to use one sides predominant ideology against itself while giving its opponent a free pass. Why stop at just coercive interrogation? How about ritualized decapitation, mutalization, use of human shields (non-combatants) for propaganda purposes? But tell me honestly, which values did you use when someone came to murder you and your family because their leaders ordered them too? Of course there weren't any exept the value of your life over your would be killers. It is only those that hold a hatred for Christianity who will use a war that someone else is waging to devalue it. It is absolutely just another way to make political rants about two things that someone has absolutely no knowledge about. This is a technique only too common in the religion debate category.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:09, 9 October 2007 (EDT)