Changes

This entry clearly illustrates the inconsistency of the Conservapedia approach to science.  The theory of evolution, which has an enormous range of experimental and observational support is reported skeptically.  But the theory of quarks (QCD) is reported as simple fact though it has little experimental support.  It would be easy to fill the page with quotes from quark skeptics at major universities as they do with evolution.

This entry clearly illustrates the inconsistency of the Conservapedia approach to science.  The theory of evolution, which has an enormous range of experimental and observational support is reported skeptically.  But the theory of quarks (QCD) is reported as simple fact though it has little experimental support.  It would be easy to fill the page with quotes from quark skeptics at major universities as they do with evolution.

: I think that the Bible quote is silly in this context. Are you trying to say that Christians don't believe in gluons? Can you point to some source that uses that Bible quote to help explain which particles are held together and which are not? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:53, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

: I think that the Bible quote is silly in this context. Are you trying to say that Christians don't believe in gluons? Can you point to some source that uses that Bible quote to help explain which particles are held together and which are not? [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:53, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

''This page is over '''atoms'''. Atoms are theory, '''not a fact'''. Information presented in this article should be critically interpreted and taken with an open mind. There are true challenges to this debated theory including the [[intelligent matter]] theory''. Comment by User: Garklieo

 

I have tried to make mention of the point that theories are by definition not facts but for some reason I have been told not to point out on the article page that atoms are just a theory. Can anyone please explain the discrepancy? I want to flesh out the Christian perspective of the "theory" of atoms the same way it is done on the evolution page. There are real objections to this "theory" and I don't see why you won't allow equal time for both points of view to be expressed. I don't mean to be rude but Genesis clearly says Adam was made out of dirt and sand, yet that is clearly contradictory to this "theory" of the atoms. How do I go about obtaining permission to place a Christian section in this article? I can use the talk or a sandbox first if you like. Thank you. --[[User:Stephlieze|Stephlieze]] 18:45, 9 October 2007 (EDT)