Conservapedia

Changes

Talk:Archaeopteryx (view source)

Revision as of 13:53, October 14, 2007

221 bytes added ,  13:53, October 14, 2007
reply
Line 22: Line 22:     
If you are going to remove actual peer-reviewd data because "it requires payment" (I don't like it either, but they have to make money somehow) while keeping easily-refuted information that has never made it to a scientific journal in your entries then you are making the conservapedia into a joke.
 
If you are going to remove actual peer-reviewd data because "it requires payment" (I don't like it either, but they have to make money somehow) while keeping easily-refuted information that has never made it to a scientific journal in your entries then you are making the conservapedia into a joke.
 +
 +
: Interesting comment about peer review.  Do you also feel that so-called "professors" who were not selected based on peer review should not be taken seriously?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:53, 14 October 2007 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,506

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/315844"