:Andy, there was nothing "liberal" about what you removed and changed in the article. Apart from Hoyle and a few isolated creationists basing their view on Hoyle, essentially nobody believes that the fossils have been faked and essentially everyone accepts that ''Archaeopteryx'' really existed. The only real dispute is over whether it was a true bird or an intermediate form. | :Andy, there was nothing "liberal" about what you removed and changed in the article. Apart from Hoyle and a few isolated creationists basing their view on Hoyle, essentially nobody believes that the fossils have been faked and essentially everyone accepts that ''Archaeopteryx'' really existed. The only real dispute is over whether it was a true bird or an intermediate form. |