Changes

614 bytes added ,  06:22, October 23, 2007
quick question
Line 89: Line 89:     
*I have no idea where this was being talked about, and who all was involved aside from Ed, Joaquin and you, but the above should be a clear enough indication to all of you.  If you don't like it, start checking with others before you act! "Others" means me, and the rest of the Site Admins.  --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 19:13, 13 October 2007 (EDT)
 
*I have no idea where this was being talked about, and who all was involved aside from Ed, Joaquin and you, but the above should be a clear enough indication to all of you.  If you don't like it, start checking with others before you act! "Others" means me, and the rest of the Site Admins.  --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 19:13, 13 October 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== quick question ==
 +
 +
I know you are very active in posting breaking news.  I think if Conservapedia had an decent article on [[WorldNetDaily]] and [[NewsBusters]] that were designed to get to the top of the search engines we could attract a lot of the readers of WorldNetDaily and NewsBusters when they Googled those websites to click on them.  Do you have any interest in this?  I could tell you what a "internet search engine master" told me in a few quick sentences so the article would be ranked highly by the search engines in all likelihood. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:22, 23 October 2007 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,880

edits