nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
902
edits
Changes
Talk:Essay:Evidence of Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 17:23, October 27, 2007
, 17:23, October 27, 2007→Antibiotic Resistance is not Evolution
It is adaptation. It would be considered "microevolution". Species change over time but they don't change into anything new. I've never seen a monkey give birth to a human or a frog give birth to a lizard. --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 22:17, 26 October 2007 (EDT)
It is adaptation. It would be considered "microevolution". Species change over time but they don't change into anything new. I've never seen a monkey give birth to a human or a frog give birth to a lizard. --[[User:Konservativekanadian|Konservativekanadian]] 22:17, 26 October 2007 (EDT)
*Such an event would actually disprove evolution, KonservativeKanadian. Same thing goes for any species directly giving birth to an entirely different one. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> 11:28, 27 October 2007 (EDT)
*Such an event would actually disprove evolution, KonservativeKanadian. Same thing goes for any species directly giving birth to an entirely different one. --<sub>[[Special:Contributions/AutoFire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>trans</font>]]</sub>[[User:AutoFire|<font color= 'red' face= 'OCR A Extended'>Resident Transfan</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Autofire|<font color= 'black' face= 'OCR A Extended'>form!</font>]]</sup> 11:28, 27 October 2007 (EDT)
:''Species change over time but they don't change into anything new.'' I don't quite get it. If anything changes, isn't it now, by definition, "something new"? Or are you using a different interpretation of the term? [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 13:23, 27 October 2007 (EDT)