8
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: − *Do you really consider your comment intelligent? Wow. More enlightened would be you proving it false, or providing a better one. I understand to some people, a merit based site is new. Try it, you might actually find it liberating! --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 02:48, 18 July 2007 (EDT)+ + +
Talk:An Inconvenient Truth (view source)
Revision as of 19:35, October 29, 2007
, 19:35, October 29, 2007→source: SirJim is correct.
do you really consider a townhall article reposted from Newsbusters a reliable source? Wow [[User:SirJim|SirJim]] 19:23, 15 July 2007 (EDT)
do you really consider a townhall article reposted from Newsbusters a reliable source? Wow [[User:SirJim|SirJim]] 19:23, 15 July 2007 (EDT)
:Do you really consider your comment intelligent? Wow. More enlightened would be you proving it false, or providing a better one. I understand to some people, a merit based site is new. Try it, you might actually find it liberating! --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 02:48, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
:: Secondary and tertiary sources aren't as reliable as primary ones. Ask any librarian and they'll tell you so. How is SirJim's comment unintelligent? Why don't you try to prove it false, or provide a better argument You might find it liberating! PS- learn proper MediaWiki notation. [[User:AngelOfMercy|AngelOfMercy]] 15:35, 29 October 2007 (EDT)
== Edit ==
== Edit ==