Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 18: Line 18:     
: We welcome well-supported facts here.  We don't censor alternative views.  But an entry is going to give credit to conservatives or Christianity or American where credit is due.  If you want to insert a liberal view that attempts to deny credit to Reagan for the fall of communism, then it should be well-supported and near the end, after the credit is fully given.  It can't be inserted in a manner suggesting that the issue is unresolved, or that we have no way of knowing whether Reagan deserves credit.  He obviously does.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:18, 10 March 2007 (EST)
 
: We welcome well-supported facts here.  We don't censor alternative views.  But an entry is going to give credit to conservatives or Christianity or American where credit is due.  If you want to insert a liberal view that attempts to deny credit to Reagan for the fall of communism, then it should be well-supported and near the end, after the credit is fully given.  It can't be inserted in a manner suggesting that the issue is unresolved, or that we have no way of knowing whether Reagan deserves credit.  He obviously does.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:18, 10 March 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
 +
I think you are all too exciteable.  This is the '''Conservative''' pedia, not Wikipedia.  Go peddle your liberal, and liberal-sourced material elsewhere. --[[User:TK|TK]] 21:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
    
== Where's your evidence? ==
 
== Where's your evidence? ==
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487

edits

Navigation menu