Changes

(For use by judges only)

(For use by judges only)

===Sschultz entry points(2-0)===

===Sschultz entry points(2-0)===

This matter was referred for determination under the rules for Contest3. The locus of this dispute revolves around the contributions of [[User:Sschultz]]. Some of his articles are felt to be silly, thereby becoming an attempt to game the system and unworthy of merit. Is a "silly article" worthy of points?

This matter was referred for determination under the rules for Contest3. The locus of this dispute revolves around the contributions of [[User:SSchultz]]. Some of his articles are felt to be silly, thereby becoming an attempt to game the system and unworthy of merit. Is a "silly article" worthy of points?

We, the Judges feel that this should not be so. The rules are clear. Entries should be of value and, most importantly, educational. Consequently, we approve the striking of all points given during this contest for uneducational/silly articles/edits. this determination is universal and applies to all editors.

We, the Judges feel that this should not be so. The rules are clear. Entries should be of value and, most importantly, educational. Consequently, we approve the striking of all points given during this contest for uneducational/silly articles/edits. this determination is universal and applies to all editors.

[[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]^{[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]} 21:04, 24 November 2007 (EST)

[[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]^{[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]} 21:04, 24 November 2007 (EST)

===Brianco lecture linking===

===Brianco lecture linking===

===GregLarson categorization===

===GregLarson categorization===

===Proposed Changes to rules===

===Proposed Changes to rules===