Changes

919 bytes added ,  20:43, November 25, 2007
Line 80: Line 80:  
[[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:38, 24 November 2007 (EST)
 
[[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]<sup>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</sup> 21:38, 24 November 2007 (EST)
 
<br />[[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 00:06, 25 November 2007 (EST)
 
<br />[[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 00:06, 25 November 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
:This is a complete travesty.  Lack of recordkeeping?  Every edit I made is linked on my contest score page.  If poor recordkeeping is an issue, then I challenge every point by ASchlafly and GregLarson since neither individual enumerated any of their edits and calculations.  False claims of credit and overcrediting?  The one point of controversy here was my use of a template to increase my score, and I conceded that point on day 1 and retracted the points.  If you feel specific articles should have been scored differently, then by all means retabulate my score.  But I certainly have not cheated, I resent the entirety of my contribution being stripped as some sort of juvenile penalty, and I'm tired of being the whipping boy for a poorly designed set of rules and for following practices performed in prior contests without so much as a second glance.  [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 15:43, 25 November 2007 (EST)
    
===Brianco lecture linking===
 
===Brianco lecture linking===
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
675

edits