nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,302
edits
Changes
changed section title to be more relevant
*Since you have absolutely no idea what real plagiarism is, JBuscombe, I invite you to discuss before deciding on your own authority (since you have none) to make wholesale removals and undo the work of long-time editors here. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 15:55, 18 November 2007 (EST)
*Since you have absolutely no idea what real plagiarism is, JBuscombe, I invite you to discuss before deciding on your own authority (since you have none) to make wholesale removals and undo the work of long-time editors here. --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 15:55, 18 November 2007 (EST)
==Many points==
==Suggestions for Improvement==
Ok - well before (I think) we started to do this whole judges thing, I layed out a few things that I thought should be changed. And I just would like to throw some points out there:
Ok - well before (I think) we started to do this whole judges thing, I layed out a few things that I thought should be changed. And I just would like to throw some points out there:
#Edits to entertainment articles are marked down to much, I think they should get about 3/4 the value of non-entertainment - as we shouldn't have quality edits to entertainment articles shouldn't even be close to minor edits to regular or entertainment articles.
#Edits to entertainment articles are marked down to much, I think they should get about 3/4 the value of non-entertainment - as we shouldn't have quality edits to entertainment articles shouldn't even be close to minor edits to regular or entertainment articles.