Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + +
Rejection of science (view source)
Revision as of 17:28, November 28, 2007
, 17:28, November 28, 2007science as a stalking-horse
When [[science]] and [[ideology]] collide, many advocates simply discard science altogether or engage in [[deception]] campaigns which obscure what science actually says; see [[junk science]].
When [[science]] and [[ideology]] collide, many advocates simply discard science altogether or engage in [[deception]] campaigns which obscure what science actually says; see [[junk science]].
In the context of {{link right|embryonic|stem cell research}}, [[Joseph Bottum]] wrote:
:I have long suspected that science, in the context of the editorial page of the New York Times, was simply a stalking-horse for something else. In fact, for two something-elses: a chance to discredit America's religious believers, and an opportunity to put yet another hedge around the legalization of abortion. [http://www.opinionjournal.com/federation/feature/?id=110010915]