nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
→Reply to All: More on what the Popes say.
:::Interesting discussion about who believes what. Are you saying the Pope is not God's representative on Earth and that he has interpreted his Bible wrong? [[User:DaleHill|DaleHill]] 12:24, 28 November 2007 (EST)
:::Interesting discussion about who believes what. Are you saying the Pope is not God's representative on Earth and that he has interpreted his Bible wrong? [[User:DaleHill|DaleHill]] 12:24, 28 November 2007 (EST)
::::: Only Catholics believe that the Pope is God's representative on Earth, and I've said that I'm not a Catholic, so the answer to your first question should be obvious. To answer the second, if the Pope has endorsed evolution and/or long ages, then yes, he's interpreted the Bible incorrectly. See my further comments below. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:55, 28 November 2007 (EST)
:::: You and PeterBird do not quote the Pope because, in fact, he neither endorsed an old earth or evolution. Nor would. Go reread above what the first Pope and founder of the Catholic Church, Peter, said.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:42, 28 November 2007 (EST)
:::: You and PeterBird do not quote the Pope because, in fact, he neither endorsed an old earth or evolution. Nor would. Go reread above what the first Pope and founder of the Catholic Church, Peter, said.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:42, 28 November 2007 (EST)
:::::This article quotes popes [http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/vaticanview.html]. Pius XII apparently embraced the big bang already in the 1950s. [[User:Order|Order]] 19:05, 28 November 2007 (EST)
:::::This article quotes popes [http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/vaticanview.html]. Pius XII apparently embraced the big bang already in the 1950s. [[User:Order|Order]] 19:05, 28 November 2007 (EST)
:::::: Order, I'm not going chase any more of your [[hearsay]]. This is [[Conservapedia]], and we're not fooled by that. If you make a claim, then you back it up with a quote '''here'''. I can only assume you are unable to do that. Please, please, waste someone else's time, somewhere else.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:26, 28 November 2007 (EST)
:::::: Order, I'm not going chase any more of your [[hearsay]]. This is [[Conservapedia]], and we're not fooled by that. If you make a claim, then you back it up with a quote '''here'''. I can only assume you are unable to do that. Please, please, waste someone else's time, somewhere else.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:26, 28 November 2007 (EST)
::::::: I probably should stay out of this one, but this is my understanding: Not everything that the Pope says is considered infallible; only specific statements. I don't recall whether or not the current Pope has said anything to endorse evolution and/or long ages, but I'm sure that at least one or two previous Popes have. However, I don't think any have done so in the form of an infallible statement. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:55, 28 November 2007 (EST)
== Primeq's edits ==
== Primeq's edits ==