5,175
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: + + + + + +
no edit summary
-- [[user:Orly|Orly]] 15:42 14 March 2007 (CET)
-- [[user:Orly|Orly]] 15:42 14 March 2007 (CET)
:Free advice for you to use, or not, as yous see fit: the reason religious debates are never resolved is simple (imo): people are trying to understand why a possibly omnipotent / omniscient being does what it does. We have no frame of reference for this, so we're stuck making all kinds of assumptions. Simple answer to any "why" question is, unfortunately, "why not?" Or "because." Or "it will all make sense 1,000 years from now, we simply lack perspective." Which doesn't mean those arguments are right, but what are you going to do?
:My advice: read, study, pray if you like. But you probably won't get an answer you like, and (conversely) you not getting an answer you like doesn't prove anything.
[[User:Aziraphale|Aziraphale]] 13:32, 14 March 2007 (EDT) , going back to technical edits where the Chicago Manual can be proved far more easily ;)