288
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + + + +
Constructionism
:Study ''communism''?? What are you, a ''commie''?!
:Study ''communism''?? What are you, a ''commie''?!
:Joking aside, I would tentatively stand along the line that most everyone already knows that communism ''is'' bad, and that this article should focus a little more on actually explaining the theory behind it (and by extension, why it turned out so bad). [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 15:12, 15 December 2007 (EST)
:Joking aside, I would tentatively stand along the line that most everyone already knows that communism ''is'' bad, and that this article should focus a little more on actually explaining the theory behind it (and by extension, why it turned out so bad). [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 15:12, 15 December 2007 (EST)
== Constructionism ==
I particularly enjoy adding "Sociologist" to the bottom of this article once a week. Because, every time I have to do it, it reminds me of how much more intelligent I am than the people who remove it. I mean, they've not yet been able to produce a valid argument as to why it shouldn't be included. Please leave the sociology to the people with formal education on the subject. --[[User:TrueGrit|TrueGrit]] 19:31, 18 December 2007 (EST)