Changes

==Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District ruling==

==Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District ruling==

Legal scholars Jay D. Wexler and Arnold H. Loewy questioned Judge Jones's ruling. <ref>Luskin, Casey [http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/03/kitzmiller_attorney_uses_harsh.html ''Kitzmiller Plaintiffs' Attorney Uses Ridicule and Harsh Rhetoric against Legal Scholars Who Question Judge Jones''] Evolution News March 16, 2007</ref>  

Legal scholars Jay D. Wexler and Arnold H. Loewy questioned Judge Jones's ruling. <ref name="casey">Luskin, Casey [http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/03/kitzmiller_attorney_uses_harsh.html ''Kitzmiller Plaintiffs' Attorney Uses Ridicule and Harsh Rhetoric against Legal Scholars Who Question Judge Jones''] Evolution News March 16, 2007</ref>  

In his ruling, Judge Jones cut and pasted (read: plagiarized) material from [[ACLU]] briefs.<ref>Moore, Art [http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53330 ''Judge copied ACLU in anti-intelligent design ruling''] World Net Daily</ref><ref>West, John G. and David K. DeWolf [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=1186 ''A Comparison of Judge Jones’ Opinion in Kitzmiller v. Dover with

In his ruling, Judge Jones cut and pasted (read: plagiarized) material from [[ACLU]] briefs.<ref name="moore">Moore, Art [http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53330 ''Judge copied ACLU in anti-intelligent design ruling''] World Net Daily</ref><ref name="west and DeWolf">West, John G. and David K. DeWolf (December 12, 2006) [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-download.php?command=download&id=1186 ''A Comparison of Judge Jones’ Opinion in Kitzmiller v. Dover with

Plaintiffs’ Proposed "Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law"''] Discovery Institute. December 12, 2006</ref><ref>http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/01/a_response_to_darwinist_defend.html</ref>  The Discovery Institute states that Judge Jones followed the ACLU and ignored contrary facts. <ref>http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/12/judge_jones_follows_aclu_ignor.html</ref>

Plaintiffs’ Proposed "Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law"''] Discovery Institute.</ref><ref>Luskin, Casey (January 26, 2007) [http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/01/a_response_to_darwinist_defend.html ''A Response to Darwinist Defenders of Judge Jones' Copying from the ACLU''] Evolution News</ref>  The Discovery Institute states that Judge Jones followed the ACLU and ignored contrary facts.<ref>Crowther, Robert (December 21, 2005)[http://www.evolutionnews.org/2005/12/judge_jones_follows_aclu_ignor.html ''Judge Jones Follows ACLU, Ignores Contrary Facts''] Evolution News</ref>

Information published by the [[Discovery Institute]] is contested.<ref>For a rebuttal argument, see [http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/jan06.html#part2 here]</ref>

After the trial, Judge Jones ordered the school district to pay over $2 million in legal fees to the ACLU's side.

After the trial, Judge Jones ordered the school district to pay over $2 million in legal fees to the ACLU's side.