Changes

Conservapedia talk:Contest4 (view source)

Revision as of 03:42, January 13, 2008

561 bytes added , 03:42, January 13, 2008

copying from .gov sites

Line 165: Line 165:

Shouldn't these be assembled now? And can we ''please'' have sensible names for the teams this time? :) --[[User:MakeTomorrow|MakeTomorrow]] 22:16, 12 January 2008 (EST)

:Slow down Make tommorow - the captains aren't even done picking the teams--[[User:Iduan|I]][[User_talk:Iduan|Duan]] 22:18, 12 January 2008 (EST)

+

== Copying issue ==

+

I think we need to revise the copying-from-federal-government point. There is nothing wrong with copying from government sites. We're here to improve this resource, not reward creative writing. A quality entry can and should copy extensively from a .gov (federal government) site rather than rewrite the material in poor form. We commissioned .gov work and we own it and we should use it. Unless there is an objection, I'm going to clarify the "1 point" (penalty) provision.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:42, 12 January 2008 (EST)

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,644

edits