9
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + +
Debate:Was the media attention needed? (view source)
Revision as of 21:53, January 16, 2008
, 21:53, January 16, 2008no edit summary
== It should have only been mentioned, not covered ==
== It should have only been mentioned, not covered ==
The coverage was useful in getting the name out, but they were quite clearly laughing at you. Sorry, us. --[[User:Falcifer|Falcifer]] 21:53, 16 January 2008
== No, but if it was not for it, I would not be here ==
== No, but if it was not for it, I would not be here ==