162
edits
Changes
no edit summary
: On your second point, the article does not say that Christian scientists are perfect either, and you seem to be contradicting yourself. You say that it is "absurd ... opinion", then indicate that Christian scientists will ''also'' do this. The clear implication is that Christian scientists will do what non-Christian scientists are also doing. So you seem to agree that it ''does'' happen.
: On your second point, the article does not say that Christian scientists are perfect either, and you seem to be contradicting yourself. You say that it is "absurd ... opinion", then indicate that Christian scientists will ''also'' do this. The clear implication is that Christian scientists will do what non-Christian scientists are also doing. So you seem to agree that it ''does'' happen.
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:00, 17 January 2008 (EST)
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 19:00, 17 January 2008 (EST)
Indeed my friend, christian scientists will ignore large amounts of data in order to fit their world view. What conservapedia does in this article is claim that non-christian scientists ignore creation based evidence (or at least distort this data) in order to prove Old earth and the like. Its not a matter of ignoring, it the fact the creation science was largely discredited and almost forgotten until the fundamentalist christain movement ressurected it again relativly recently.
If I may expand on what I meant above - christian science will routinly bedunk any science that openly contradicts their own beliefs. Scientists are not part of an athestic movement with the sole purpose of discrediting creation and the like. Just because their research doesnt match a chritian POV doesnt mean the data has been deliberatly distorted that way.
And secondly, you say China's advances only became what we know as chemistry in Medival Europe is semantics. Chemistry is only word. The Chinas were excellent astromers and chemists no matter what word you use and Chinese rulers frequently had people on thier staff to research and report to them on their findings. Which is science.
[[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]]