439
edits
Changes
Talk:Sudden Jihad Syndrome (view source)
Revision as of 20:51, January 18, 2008
, 20:51, January 18, 2008→Merge Discussion: disagree strongly with merge
:I agree with Jenkins' sentiment if not his tact. I think the article should be deleted, but I would be ok with it being merged and edited to comply with the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]]. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:11, 18 January 2008 (EST)
:I agree with Jenkins' sentiment if not his tact. I think the article should be deleted, but I would be ok with it being merged and edited to comply with the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]]. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:11, 18 January 2008 (EST)
I disagree strongly with merging this. I think Pipes is wrong. I don't know if he is being racist. But none of that is relevant. The term isn't used only by Daniel Pipes. Google shows over 25,000 hits for it. [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22Sudden+Jihad+Syndrome%22&btnG=Google+Search] . The term has been used in other notable places such as a column in the Washington times. <ref>http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080102/NATION/203823370/1001</ref>. And the connection of all these terrorists to SJS has been made by other sources also[http://www.montanasnews.com/articles.php?mode=view&id=7227]. [[User:SkipJohnson|SkipJohnson]] 15:51, 18 January 2008 (EST)