541
edits
Changes
Talk:Sudden Jihad Syndrome (view source)
Revision as of 03:31, January 19, 2008
, 03:31, January 19, 2008Restoring comment with a note why I restore it. If you feel like reverting it YET AGAIN, please tell me WHY. Or are discussion pages only for non-sysops?
:I agree with Jenkins' sentiment if not his tact. I think the article should be deleted, but I would be ok with it being merged and edited to comply with the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]]. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:11, 18 January 2008 (EST)
:I agree with Jenkins' sentiment if not his tact. I think the article should be deleted, but I would be ok with it being merged and edited to comply with the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines]]. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 15:11, 18 January 2008 (EST)
:::'''NOTE:''' The following comment was removed ''twice'' without explanation, and the only hint is a mysterious block note that reads "Try using better tact when talking about the people here". However, this post talks about '''Daniel Pipes''', who, to the best of my knowledge, is not a CP editor. On the other hand, Skip accused me of liberal deceit in an edit comment and did not even receive a warning. Thus, I feel that this comment should stay. Removing ''discussion'' post is completely against the spirit of having a ''discussion''. Or is there some connection between Pipes and CP that I'm not aware of? If he's some sort of Holy Man here, I'll back off, but until then, I will not censor myself just because he is a conservative. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 22:31, 18 January 2008 (EST)
:::Sorry, but I already brought this up on Andy's talk page and the Examples of Bias talk page, and those posts were ignored. (You know how that feels...) However, I admit that I'm not wasting much tact on something that is effectively just racism (or at least an open invitation for it). Quoting our dear, "neoconservative academic" himself:
{{cquote|Individual Islamists may appear law-abiding and reasonable, but they are part of a totalitarian movement, and as such, all must be considered potential killers.}}
:::What's the next step then? Since they "must be considered potential killers", let's... oh, I dunno... stuff them all into prisons or a [[ghetto]] so they can't commit Sudden Jihad? Oh, and make them wear a special badge around their arm so we're warned... *whistles innocently*
:::Here, a bonus, from the same City Journal article:
{{cquote|The first and most straightforward thing is not to allow any more Islamists into the country. Each Islamist who enters the United States, whether as a visitor or an immigrant, is one more enemy on the home front. Officials need to scrutinize the speech, associations, and activities of potential visitors or immigrants for any signs of Islamist allegiances and keep out anyone they suspect of such ties.
(...)
Resident Muslim aliens who reveal themselves to be Islamist should be immediately expelled from the country before they have a chance to act. Citizen Islamists will have to be watched very closely and without cease.}}
:::Yep, I can feel the love. Let the [[racial profiling]] begin! Let's monitor everybody for <s>thoughtcrime</s> Islamist trends! I'll accept being called a liberal for opposing this open hate. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 15:37, 18 January 2008 (EST)