nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Talk:Flying Spaghetti Monster (view source)
Revision as of 12:20, January 23, 2008
, 12:20, January 23, 2008→Food for thought: The presumption behind that rationale
The rational for the Flying Spagetti Monster is as follows:
The rational for the Flying Spagetti Monster is as follows:
There is equal evidence for all gods and supernatural beleifs, therefore the likelihood of the spagetti monster is equal to that of any God. If you ridicule the belief in the spagetti monster then you have to apply the same ridicule to all other religous beleifs.
There is equal evidence for all gods and supernatural beleifs, therefore the likelihood of the spagetti monster is equal to that of any God. If you ridicule the belief in the spagetti monster then you have to apply the same ridicule to all other religous beleifs.
: That might be the rationale, but that rationale depends on the ''presumption'' that there ''is'' "equal evidence for all gods and supernatural beleifs(sic)". As a Christian, I totally reject that presumption, therefore if I do ridicule belief in the spaghetti monster, it does not follow that I have to apply the same ridicule to other beliefs. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:20, 23 January 2008 (EST)
==FSM and ID criticism==
==FSM and ID criticism==