Changes

no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:     
As it stands, the entire article has two sentences, subjective claims, and no citations. With no proof whatsoever, i doubt the existence of "Liberal Supremacists", having never heard of them before. I'll gladly change my view if i see one piece of proof.
 
As it stands, the entire article has two sentences, subjective claims, and no citations. With no proof whatsoever, i doubt the existence of "Liberal Supremacists", having never heard of them before. I'll gladly change my view if i see one piece of proof.
 +
 +
To be fair, this term is on the list of "Conservapedia terms" that have been created for this site.  Doing a quick google turned up 38 hits, all from blogs, except for CP's page (and frankly CP is essentially a fundamentalist blog with a bad desk encyclopedia attached.)  CP is making no bones about this being a "made up" term, although they should probably make a category for these terms. [[User:Boomcoach|Boomcoach]] 13:48, 23 January 2008 (EST)
252

edits