| Line 83: |
Line 83: |
| | | | |
| | {{main|Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District}} | | {{main|Kitzmiller vs. Dover Area School District}} |
| | + | |
| | In 2004, the Dover County School Board in Pennsylvania, U.S.A., approved a curriculum which included that teachers should read to their class the following statement: | | In 2004, the Dover County School Board in Pennsylvania, U.S.A., approved a curriculum which included that teachers should read to their class the following statement: |
| | {{QuoteBox|Because Darwin’s Theory is a theory, it is still being tested as new evidence is discovered. The Theory is not a fact. Gaps in the Theory exist for which there is no evidence. A theory is defined as a well-tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations.<br /><br />Intelligent design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin’s view. The reference book, ''Of Pandas and People'' is available for students to see if they would like to explore this view in an effort to gain an understanding of what intelligent design actually involves. As is true with any theory, students are encouraged to keep an open mind.}} | | {{QuoteBox|Because Darwin’s Theory is a theory, it is still being tested as new evidence is discovered. The Theory is not a fact. Gaps in the Theory exist for which there is no evidence. A theory is defined as a well-tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations.<br /><br />Intelligent design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin’s view. The reference book, ''Of Pandas and People'' is available for students to see if they would like to explore this view in an effort to gain an understanding of what intelligent design actually involves. As is true with any theory, students are encouraged to keep an open mind.}} |
| | | | |
| | But even this was too much for the committed evolutionists, and a court challenge, backed by the [[American Civil Liberties Union]], saw the requirement removed, on the grounds that the proponents of the requirement had religious motives. | | But even this was too much for the committed evolutionists, and a court challenge, backed by the [[American Civil Liberties Union]], saw the requirement removed, on the grounds that the proponents of the requirement had religious motives. |
| | + | |
| | + | ==== Philip Bishop ==== |
| | + | |
| | + | Associate professor of physiology, Dr. [[Philip Bishop]], was taken to court by his employer, the [[University of Alabama]], to stop him briefly expressing his views favouring [[Intelligent design]], on the grounds that they were religious. |
| | + | Yet views ''opposing'' religion are routinely expressed in classes with no attempts made to stop them.<ref>Bergman, 2004</ref> |
| | | | |
| | === Peer review === | | === Peer review === |