35
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: + + + + + + + +
User talk:CarolineMilton (view source)
Revision as of 23:23, February 12, 2008
, 23:23, February 12, 2008→What you saw
::::::: "''But I couldn't for a moment take such an explanation seriously. Good grief Philip, dinosaurs have been extinct for millions of years.''": Now you are letting your worldview affect your interpretation of the evidence. That they have been extinct for millions of years is merely an aspect of the atheistic origins myth, and is contradicted by quite a bit of evidence, of which this cave painting is just one minor example.
::::::: "''But I couldn't for a moment take such an explanation seriously. Good grief Philip, dinosaurs have been extinct for millions of years.''": Now you are letting your worldview affect your interpretation of the evidence. That they have been extinct for millions of years is merely an aspect of the atheistic origins myth, and is contradicted by quite a bit of evidence, of which this cave painting is just one minor example.
::::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:53, 12 February 2008 (EST)
::::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:53, 12 February 2008 (EST)
:::::::: If you need some practice in recognizing the name of Allah in various naturally occurring places just click [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SS2VFNpFPQU here]. I would really appreciate your view as to what is going on. Are these people deluded? Or perhaps Allah did deliberately place his name in these places. Do tell me.
:::::::: Also, when I mentioned wishful thinking I wasn't referring to the discoverer, I was thinking of someone else. The fact that the discoverer claims to see a dinosaur is neither here nor there. If the drawing had been discovered by Erich von Däniken (remember him?) he would have claimed it as a picture of an alien visitor. Would you then see it as an alien?
:::::::: You say I am letting my world view affect my interpretation of the evidence. Well, I guess I am. Sure it looks a bit like a dinosaur. And if man and dinosaur had been around at the same time I might be attracted to the idea. However, because the picture is so thoroughly lacking in detail it is just not feasible to claim it as in any way significantly supportive of a theory that man and dinosaur co-existed. You'd really need something with a bit more detail.
:::::::: Now we come to your world view: "the atheistic origins myth"? "quite a lot of evidence"? I am intrigued. What do you find to be the most compelling piece of evidence supportive of the co-existence of man and dinosaur? --[[User:CarolineMilton|CarolineMilton]] 18:23, 12 February 2008 (EST)
Is it a...kangaroo? :P [[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 20:48, 10 February 2008 (EST)
Is it a...kangaroo? :P [[User:BethanyS|~BCS]]<sup>[[User talk:BethanyS|Talk2'''ME''']]</sup> 20:48, 10 February 2008 (EST)