Changes

YEC is not all of Creationism
Line 68: Line 68:  
: But what many evolutionists often do is neither of those approaches, but to reject the creationist argument that civilisation is no more than 4,350 years old by quoting ''evolutionary dates'' for the civilisations being older.  So they will say, "the flood could not have happened 4,350 years ago, as Egypt has been around for 5,000 years".  As someone else coined the phrase, ''your theory doesn't fit with my theory so your theory must be wrong''.  The point being, arguing that creationists are wrong ''because it doesn't fit within the evolutionary viewpoint'' is an invalid argument.  That's what I was saying anti-creationists do very often, and I reject that I do the same the other way.  And this is what your 6,000 years of erosion argument was doing.
 
: But what many evolutionists often do is neither of those approaches, but to reject the creationist argument that civilisation is no more than 4,350 years old by quoting ''evolutionary dates'' for the civilisations being older.  So they will say, "the flood could not have happened 4,350 years ago, as Egypt has been around for 5,000 years".  As someone else coined the phrase, ''your theory doesn't fit with my theory so your theory must be wrong''.  The point being, arguing that creationists are wrong ''because it doesn't fit within the evolutionary viewpoint'' is an invalid argument.  That's what I was saying anti-creationists do very often, and I reject that I do the same the other way.  And this is what your 6,000 years of erosion argument was doing.
 
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:32, 24 January 2008 (EST)
 
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:32, 24 January 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
== YEC is not all of Creationism ==
 +
 +
I would ask that someone go through this article and seperate YEC from Creationism.  YEC is a branch of Creationism, but not the whole.  In fact, I would say that YEC is a fringe group and thus all statements which go roughly "This is how Creationists argue [something]" should be replaced with "This is how Young Earth Creationists/Young Earthers/YECs argue [something]" before you give people the wrong impression.  It is bad enough that Wikipedia does this, does conservapedia has to do it too?
6

edits