185
edits
Changes
→Liberal bias: Reply to Suzy P (?)
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:42, 4 March 2008 (EST)
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:42, 4 March 2008 (EST)
== Liberal bias ==
== Modifications made without discussion ==
PhoenixWright, you're introducing too much [[liberal bias]] into this. It should remain clear and factual. Please raise objections here first.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:41, 4 March 2008 (EST)
PhoenixWright, you're introducing too much [[liberal bias]] into this. It should remain clear and factual. Please raise objections here first.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:41, 4 March 2008 (EST)
:I think you're neglecting who's the one intruding here. Philip and I had a nice draft, and I don't appreciate changes that disturb our compromise and hard work. I see you're somewhat important here, so I won't revert it, but perhaps ''you'' could explain ''yourself'' here. I've fully explained myself above.-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 10:52, 4 March 2008 (EST)
:I think you're neglecting who's the one intruding here. Philip and I had a nice draft, and I don't appreciate changes that disturb our compromise and hard work. I see you're somewhat important here, so I won't revert it, but perhaps ''you'' could explain ''yourself'' here. I've fully explained myself above.-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 10:52, 4 March 2008 (EST)
:: AmesG, this is a wiki. It's a collaborative process open to many people. If you object to my plainly factual edits, then state why. If you prefer liberal bias, then try Wikipedia. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:20, 4 March 2008 (EST)
:: AmesG, this is a wiki. It's a collaborative process open to many people. If you object to my plainly factual edits, then state why. If you prefer liberal bias, then try Wikipedia. Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:20, 4 March 2008 (EST)
::: You've stated now that my additions were "liberal bias," while yours were "factual." However, all you've done to support this is to restate your conclusion, twice now. You may know that arguments do not become facts by your ''ipse dixit''. Please support your arguments; otherwise, I can't see why I wouldn't be entitled to revert them. You say that I should state my objections to your edits; if you had followed and courteously contributed to the discussion between myself and Philip Rayment, you'd probably see that your obvious concerns had been answered and addressed. Please take the time to read the discussion between us before blowing apart our work. You seem to be going directly against the "collaborative process" you (correctly) define as central to a wiki-environment... unless your definition of "collaborative process" is "the unilateral foisting of my opinion onto yours."
::: Next, this is the ''second time'' you've insulted me by misstating my user name, the first by omitting its latter half; the second by substituting for it what sounds like a diminutive girl's name. If this is some kind of cruel joke, I don't get it. If it's some kind of veiled accusation, I still don't get it. Either way, it's uncalled for and uncivil. I hope that we can work past this uncivil episode. When I come back later in the day, I hope to see your constructive criticism and an apology for the unnecessary insult. I would enjoy working with you but not in this tone.-[[User:PhoenixWright|PhoenixWright]] 16:31, 4 March 2008 (EST)